Diablo

I'm currently reading The Transmigration of Timothy Archer by Philip K. Dick. I'm not too far into it, but I already feel that I'll be recommending it, just as I did with the only other of his books that I've read: The Man in the High Castle.

Here's a passage that I just read. Timothy Archer's son has just committed suicide and he's discussing a new idea he's had about the nature of Satan:

"I see the legend of Satan in a new way. Satan desired to know God as fully as possible. The fullest knowledge would come if he became God, was himself God. He strove for this and achieved it, knowing that the punishment would be permanent exile from God. But he did it anyhow, because the memory of knowing God, really knowing him as no else ever had or would, justified to him his eternal punishment. Now, who would you say truly loved God out of everyone who ever existed? Satan willingly accepted eternal punishment and exile just to know God-by becoming God-for an instant. Futher, it occurs to me, Satan truly knew God, but perhaps God did not know or understand Satan; had He understood him He would not have punished him. That is why it is said that Satan rebelled-which means Satan was outside of God's control, outside God's domain, as if in another universe. But Satan did I think welcome his punishment, for it was his proof to himself that he knew and loved God. Otherwise he might have done what he did for the reward... had there been a reward. 'Better to rule in hell than to serve in heaven' is an issue, here, but not the true one: which is the ultimate goal and search to know and be: fully and really to know God, in comparison to which all else is really very little."

Archer goes on to propose that "in a sense, human beings can redeem Satan by wresting this knowledge from him."

I can't help but wonder what legitimacy there is to this argument. For the most part Philip K. Dick presents interesting ideas to me without actually changing what I believe directly. This, however, feels different. I am presented with a direct challenge about the way I think about God. Should I keep my mind open to the possibility of God being limited by the actions of another. Not to say that God is not aware of Lucifer's motivations, but rather that his judgment can be forced. Can God's grace extend beyond the theological boundaries we have constructed from scripture, no matter what our interpretation?

Euro

As of 6 days ago I have a new niece. I am an uncle for the fifth time. It feels a little different because my brother is the closest in age to me. Also, because I only have one brother and he just had his first, she is my first niece or nephew that bears the family name.

I like the name Eloise. It was a name that I thought about naming my own daughter someday, but I guess that won't happen. I'm not disappointed.

Also, I'm in no rush. I'm planning on grad school and that sort of plan seems to get trumped by little ones. My brother's pulling it off, I guess, but I am not he.

Penny

I named my bike Penny. I admit naming your possessions is lame, but that hasn't stopped me with my computer, my phone, my previous phone, and I think that's about it.

I think I name things that seem to have personality. For example, Penny is flawed, but not unreliable. She doesn't like being locked up and she is most herself when she is at high speeds. She likes roads, but not the city. On the other hand, Nelly, my computer, is completely schizophrenic.

I think I'm going to write a story called "World of Pennies."

It won't have anything to do with my bike.